<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shark! Shark! in the IT business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.frankel.ch/shark-shark-in-the-it-business/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.frankel.ch/shark-shark-in-the-it-business</link>
	<description>Nicolas Fränkel blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:06:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas Frankel</title>
		<link>http://blog.frankel.ch/shark-shark-in-the-it-business/comment-page-1#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas Frankel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.frankel.ch/?p=256#comment-486</guid>
		<description>Sorry Jean-Pierre, I must disagree on your point, since JBoss 5 is still available in GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) Open Source license. Check jboss.org (as opposed to jboss.com).

This kind of deal is the best for everyone since you have all benefits of OpenSource but with service equally available. The biggest argument against Open Source was the lack of support in the old days. MySQL and JBoss offer the best of both worlds IMHO.

What worries me more is the single vendor dystopia where you have no choice over your products because there&#039;s only one provider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Jean-Pierre, I must disagree on your point, since JBoss 5 is still available in GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) Open Source license. Check jboss.org (as opposed to jboss.com).</p>
<p>This kind of deal is the best for everyone since you have all benefits of OpenSource but with service equally available. The biggest argument against Open Source was the lack of support in the old days. MySQL and JBoss offer the best of both worlds IMHO.</p>
<p>What worries me more is the single vendor dystopia where you have no choice over your products because there&#8217;s only one provider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Pierre</title>
		<link>http://blog.frankel.ch/shark-shark-in-the-it-business/comment-page-1#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Pierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.frankel.ch/?p=256#comment-485</guid>
		<description>Nice and interesting article ! I do wonder what happens with people who invested a lot of their free time contributing to an open source project, fueling by their effort what the french philosopher Bernard Stiegler calls the contributive economy, when this articular open source product is purchased by one of those &quot;shark&quot; and is no longer available freely, like is the case with the last versions of JBoss 5 ? I&#039;d be curious to know if they are angry, disappointed, if this shark eat&#039;em all game may endanger the open source institution or if everything is ok in the best possible world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice and interesting article ! I do wonder what happens with people who invested a lot of their free time contributing to an open source project, fueling by their effort what the french philosopher Bernard Stiegler calls the contributive economy, when this articular open source product is purchased by one of those &#8220;shark&#8221; and is no longer available freely, like is the case with the last versions of JBoss 5 ? I&#8217;d be curious to know if they are angry, disappointed, if this shark eat&#8217;em all game may endanger the open source institution or if everything is ok in the best possible world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

