<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Java geek &#187; Java</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.frankel.ch/tag/java/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.frankel.ch</link>
	<description>Nicolas Fränkel blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:41:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Java, Scala, complexity and aardvarks</title>
		<link>http://blog.frankel.ch/java-scala-complexity-and-aardvarks</link>
		<comments>http://blog.frankel.ch/java-scala-complexity-and-aardvarks#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 18:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas Frankel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scala]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.frankel.ch/?p=2004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week saw another flame war from some of the Scala crowd. This time, it was toward Stephen Colebourne, the man behind Joda time. The article in question can be found here, and Stephen&#8217;s answer here. To be frank, I tend to agree to Stephen&#8217;s predicat but for very different reasons. Now, if you&#8217;re a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.frankel.ch/java-scala-complexity-and-aardvarks/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thoughts on Java logging and SLF4J</title>
		<link>http://blog.frankel.ch/thoughts-on-java-logging-and-slf4j</link>
		<comments>http://blog.frankel.ch/thoughts-on-java-logging-and-slf4j#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas Frankel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[api]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commons logging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implementation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[log4j]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slf4j]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.frankel.ch/?p=310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this post, I will ramble on logging in Java, how it was done in the old days and what can a library like SLF4J can bring.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.frankel.ch/thoughts-on-java-logging-and-slf4j/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JNA meets JNI</title>
		<link>http://blog.frankel.ch/jna-meets-jni</link>
		<comments>http://blog.frankel.ch/jna-meets-jni#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 15:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas Frankel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[java native access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[native]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[win32]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.frankel.ch/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I reccently stumbled upon a nice framework you&#8217;ll love if you ever have to work with native code. Before this framework, if you needed to call native code, you would use JNI. JNI uses a proved but complex and error-prone process. First thing first, you write your Java classes like always. But for methods you [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.frankel.ch/jna-meets-jni/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

