<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Java geek &#187; mockito</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.frankel.ch/tag/mockito/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.frankel.ch</link>
	<description>Nicolas Fränkel blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:41:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mockito&#8217; spy() method and Spring</title>
		<link>http://blog.frankel.ch/mockito-spy-method-and-spring</link>
		<comments>http://blog.frankel.ch/mockito-spy-method-and-spring#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 22:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas Frankel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[factoryBean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mockito]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stub]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stubbing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unit testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.frankel.ch/?p=128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mockito is a mocking framework (see Two different mocking approaches) that is an offshoot of EasyMock. Whatever the mocking framework one uses, a common feature is the ability to mock interfaces, through the JDK Proxy class. This is well and nice, but one has to explicitly mock every method that one wants to use in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.frankel.ch/mockito-spy-method-and-spring/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two different mocking approaches</title>
		<link>http://blog.frankel.ch/two-different-mocking-approaches</link>
		<comments>http://blog.frankel.ch/two-different-mocking-approaches#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas Frankel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isolation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mockito]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mockrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.frankel.ch/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether you choose to choose to adopt TDD or a more traditional approach, you will test your classes in isolation. This usually mean you code with interfaces and inject your dependencies in your classes. Last year, I had to test a servlet. Servlets are the showcase to demonstrate out-of-container testing because of their dependencies to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.frankel.ch/two-different-mocking-approaches/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

